Showing posts with label whole person care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whole person care. Show all posts

Friday, 12 April 2019

The importance of a human touch

The last couple of weeks have had some sad moments, as my elderly neighbour lost his wife after a short but unexpected illness.

He is in his late eighties and loves painting in his spare time, so we have been saving episodes of Portrait Artist of the Year for him to watch with us over a bite to eat. We know he’s desperately missing his wife, so it’s our small way of providing some friendship and support.

We all know that older people are especially vulnerable to social isolation and it can have a serious effect on health. Loneliness doesn’t just feel sad; it is bad for you too.

If like me you have elderly parents, then I’m sure you worry about them too. Mine now live in Hampshire, far away from other family members, and totally rely on each other, so I do worry about what will happen if one of them is left on their own.

I visited my parents for Mother’s Day, and my mum had just been for an appointment at a dementia assessment clinic as her memory has gradually been getting worse. At this stage, they don't appear too worried and although her short term memory is a bit dodgy, they didn't think there was much wrong with her cognitive functioning. However, the same day they reached that conclusion, she sent a birthday card to my son, signed upside down and with a cheque with my brother’s name on it (they are both Chris but with different surnames!). We all saw the funny side of it, because worrying about it won’t help anyone at this point.

My mum has a very down to earth approach to growing old. She’s originally from Blackburn and has a lot of northern pragmatism, so from her perspective she's happy she has had her 'three score and ten' and isn't at all worried about 'popping her clogs' as she says!

Many people are living a lot longer than 70 these days though. The NHS is a victim of its own success in a way, as this Silver Age achievement risks a ‘demographic timebomb’ with an older and sicker population. But, how a society treats its most vulnerable – whether its children, the disabled or the elderly – is always the measure of its humanity.

And I saw heart-warming humanity in abundance when I visited The Meadows in Stockport last week, which provides a wide range of mental health and specialist care services for older people, including inpatients, a dementia day care service and community outreach services. It was good to see it from a personal perspective as well, and I was so impressed with the fantastic leadership and team work.

I had a tour of the unit and met with service managers and staff from different parts of The Meadows, including  Davenport, Saffron and Rosewood wards, as well as a range of community services including the community mental health, discharge planning, home intervention, liaison service and short-term support teams.

They are a brilliant example of true integration delivering the best possible care and support for people.   The teams are co-located, with genuine collaboration across different services. This hasn’t happened overnight, but has been built up over a long time with passion and commitment. It was clear the staff in the unit go the extra mile for their patients, day in and day out, because they care so much. It was a humbling and inspiring thing to see.

It’s always interesting to hear about people’s concerns first-hand, and The Meadows teams are worried about a couple of big issues, including potential changes to the way the local authority organises their social services, and what our aspiration to tackle mixed sex accommodation might mean for their patients and staff.

They appear to have a great model of integration and collaboration, and it made me think about Walter Leutz’s ‘five truths about integration’.  His five truths, from studying the process in the US and UK, are you can’t integrate all of the services for all of the people; your integration is my fragmentation; integration costs before it pays; you can't integrate a square peg into a round hole; and the one who integrates calls the tune.

We have to be careful that we don't bring about fragmentation of a successful model at The Meadows, just so we can fix a problem elsewhere.

Over the next few weeks I am going to be prioritising visits to corporate service teams. I know some of you will be thinking, ‘but that’s where she’s based, so surely she sees them all the time’. But it’s amazing how you can work at Trust HQ and only see the same small number of faces.

These visits will just be informal drop-ins, but I’m very aware that people have been working really hard recently, with lots of competing demands, coupled with anxiety about how TUPE associated with the transfer of community services will impact teams.

I am very grateful to all staff that have been affected by the transfer of community services for your professionalism over the last few months. So, I wanted to finish by thanking everyone, whatever service you work in across our Trust, for your continued efforts. It makes a real difference and the results are evident.

We’ve seen it with our finances for example, and although we still have an underlying deficit, thanks to everyone's efforts, we have finished 2018/19 in a better place than expected.

And it’s not just money where your efforts are paying off. We’ve hit some tough annual targets for 2018/19 as well, such as delayed transfers of care, mental health access targets and information governance training.

So, a huge thank you for your commitment and hard work. It is very much appreciated.

Best wishes,
Claire

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Time to grasp the nettle

I recently attended a retirement lunch for one of our mental health Clinical Directors and naturally we talked about the challenges ahead at a time where we have the Devolution Manchester Strategic Plan, a GM mental health strategy and a national mental health strategy all emerging. We shared a sense of great optimism, whilst recognising the challenges ahead will be, well, challenging.

It struck me that whilst moving forward, we still need to look back and not forget what we have done well and should celebrate and learn from our achievements but if ever there was a time to grasp the nettle, it’s in 2016.

Working together  

If 2015 was all about strategic development then 2016 should be about implementation.  This year will also be about partnerships and new ways of working together across health and social care.

But if I was to look back, what partnerships have we developed that have taken care forward and what have we implemented to do things differently?  In mental health specifically, what developments can we learn from to inform our plans for the future?

If we are to change the way we deliver health and social care to address the challenges set out in the GM Devolution Strategic Plan, what are the key two or three things we need to do differently in 2016 and beyond?  To achieve difference we have to do different.

Pennine Care launched its whole person care strategy in 2014 and I’m pleased to say that it remains relevant today and reassures me that our ambitions were the right ones.

The NHS England Five Year Forward View talked about a broad consensus on what the future should like for healthcare. Pennine Care’s strategy drew on that, as well as the voice of our staff and those who use our services. The Devolution Strategic Plan endorses much of our strategy but also sets a bigger picture vision and stretch challenge for providers to develop evermore far reaching plans, in partnership with others.

When thinking about partnerships, I look back and can see we knew then it was important that we changed the organisation and started to deliver through 'place and people', not through Pennine Care the ‘Trust’. We have still some way to go but it does mean that over the last two/three years we have been on this journey, we are comfortable working in places, with partners and developing local care organisations together. We bring to the table a strong track record on managing quality, safety, money and large groups of staff, blended locally according to the needs of each town.

Partnerships in practice

For instance in Oldham, we have worked with primary care, social care and voluntary partners to establish an independently chaired Care Consortium.  It was important to bring agencies together to promote innovation and I believe we have delivered some real change.  We are currently undertaking an evaluation of the work and will publish this over the coming weeks.

Around 25% of the Greater Manchester population have a mental health and wellbeing issue and as a GM economy, we spend more than £1bn on long term conditions linked to mental health.  So I feel very enthused about the opportunities to improve mental health care across Greater Manchester.  There are more leaders coming together than ever before and more commitment too.

The three NHS providers responsible for the majority of mental health care in GM are starting to collaborate more, such as across specialist services and supporting the acute mental health pressures facing the city. This has ranged from rapidly opening additional beds, to putting capacity in the system, through to setting up psychiatry liaison services to help with hospital pressures.

In Stockport, we have worked with commissioners and Stockport NHS Foundation Trust to set up a new ground breaking facility, called Saffron Ward.  Saffron provides intermediate care for older people with delirium, who often don’t get the care they need when in hospital. This ward, linked to our RAID services, brings people from the acute hospital setting and provides an integrated care pathway, to provide treatment and care. We have found patients and their families really value this bespoke care, the outcomes are better, older people retain more independence and it has significant financial benefits over the costs to run the service.

Through these examples I hope to show that partnership working has many faces, local partnerships, partnerships with different types of providers and between trusts with common care pathways.  In our recent experience, we have learned to listen, engage and find ways to work with partners that helps everyone feel on board and with a voice to influence how we develop services. This principle of co-production will be key to our future success.

Putting people first

So far I haven’t included the most important partnerships of all… the most significant shift in how we plan, deliver and operate care will be through the partnerships we develop with patients, carers and wider communities. Changing the way we deliver health and social care, will only work if we can change the way people use services and how they look after their own health.

I am very optimistic we can and the work Pennine Care has done through My Health My Community has seen a substantial change in our approach to care. At its heart, MHMC is a living well academy, a self-care resource and a movement towards self-management at scale.  Importantly, the self-care resources and support programmes are entirely co-produced with service users and carers, from ideas, through to development and delivery. 

The NHS has a long standing history of great care, I am proud to be a part of it and my 31 years as a nurse, a leader and now a Chief Executive. However, we have to move away from 'doing to' patients and start working with people and their communities.

As a Trust we know we haven’t got it all right, there is much to do, but for 2016 onwards our staff have partnership working, place-based delivery and whole person care as three key driving principles. Importantly, we can adapt how we work this way wherever and however the local conditions are set. Even more importantly we are changing how we relate to an individual’s care. Across all providers and with all staff, we will need to be both open minded, flexible and progressive as we move forward together.

New models of care and mental health 

The examples I have outlined show how we are developing an alternative narrative to hospital care. Hospitals do great work, but they are busy and under pressure. Local care provider arrangements have to build better and alternative care models to the offer we currently provide. But we can’t just say it needs to happen, we have to make the case for it and demonstrate propositions that we can confidently invest in, knowing it will help reduce hospital pressures and keep people out of hospital-based care.

We must be able to measure, demonstrate and show the benefit over cost of the new care systems we are building and so health economic modelling, such as that undertaken by Pennine Care, is increasingly an integral part of how we plan and implement care.

With new models of care, I still think we underestimate the importance of mental health and how good mental health care can have far reaching benefits. In 2016 we are in a much better place than when I started my psychiatric nurse training in 1984. Back then ‘psychiatric patients’ were viewed negatively, a significant amount of care was provided through large asylums, the media often portrayed people with mental illness as dangerous and talking about your mental health problem was largely still a taboo.

Today, the vast majority of care is provided in community-based settings, most often in people's own homes.  Many patients prefer to be described as service users and have far greater involvement in planning services and their own care than ever before. I would never try to say we have arrived, we still have a long way to go, but we have travelled an incredibly long distance in the right direction. 

We now have national campaigns such as Time to Change, issues on mental health are much more accepted in the media with substantially more positive reporting. Whether it’s through soap operas such as Coronation Street or EastEnders dealing sensitively with mental illness or well-known celebrities talking about their own mental health, the stigma associated with mental illness has dramatically reduced. However, it is still there, it is still a problem and we must do more.

I believe education on mental health is at the core of further reducing stigma, I think it’s at the core of delivering better health services overall. So education is key and specifically we must ensure we are acting on the evidence that demonstrates good mental health care leads to better health overall.

For example, back in 2011 the London School of Economics published a review of the evidence for good mental health care and wider health and economic benefits. The Kings Fund have also reported on the benefits of better mental health for people with long term conditions and its health economic benefits. 

The new Greater Manchester strategy also draws together the known benefits of good mental health care improving physical health and the need for good physical care for those with a severe and enduring mental illness. The body of evidence is substantial yet the investment in and integration of good mental health care in all care, remains patchy at best.

A five year forward view across Greater Manchester

This could be a blog in its own right, a book even!  I thought I would close with some key features I would like to see in place by the time we get to 2021. These are just a few examples based on where I think we need to make substantial progress: 
  • All people with health care needs having their own self-care/self-management plan and feeling in control of their care
  • Less hospital beds and more virtual beds, in people’s homes, supported by technology, care coordination and support for carers
  • Mature partnership working and collaboration, between healthcare providers, primary care, social care, third sector, housing, employment and wider
  • A collaborative system for Greater Manchester which unifies mental health care standards but delivers through local integrated models of care
  • Psychological care and mental health care at scale where it can help reduce hospital usage, improve physical healthcare outcomes and help prevent future health problems
  • A vibrant third sector and leisure sector leading on prevention and wellbeing and helping communities become more active and healthy
  • Increased prosperity across the city region and better employment prospects for those who we don’t adequately support now, specifically those with mental health needs
  • A recognised standard care offer for people in their own homes or communities, a hospital system with the time to care and reduced pressures, with far reaching programmes of health prevention and education
  • Better care and prospects for young people and support to families to give young people the best chance in life

I could go on, but I don’t need to as this is a good time for Greater Manchester. There is a shared view on what the right things are that need to be done. The trick now is selecting the two or three most important things (that will deliver the most impact) to start with in 2016 and build from there as we work towards 2021. 

I’m looking forward to being a part of it and hope you are too... 

Michael 

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

An eye opening visit to Bury

There are many good reasons to go to Bury - the World Famous Bury Market  or the East Lancashire Steam Railway or the very beautiful Burrs Country Park... but last week I went to Bury for a very good reason, to visit the Bury Community Stroke Team. 

I mention Bury’s well-known tourist attractions such as the World Famous Market because people travel far and wide to visit. Yet when we mention examples of healthcare worth travelling to see, Sweden or USA are often mentioned, but not Bury.


Well, I spent an inspirational afternoon with the Bury Community Stroke Team, managed by Lisa and led by Jo, and it was well worth the short journey up the M66.  As much as I’d welcome a visit to Jönköping or Boston, the Bury Community Stroke Team show we can reach for world class care here in the UK!

The service is a great example of where commissioners and providers have come together to do the right thing for patients - improve care pathways and empower people to manage their own healthcare needs.

Whenever I read about healthcare, plan strategy or visit services, I look for a number of things - a well-led service, clear operational plans and specifications, the promotion of self-care, whole person care and the holy grail of good physical and mental health care combined. 

If I had been playing community stroke service Bingo (that well known pastime!) I would have been shouting ‘house’ after thirty minutes of Jo and her team describing their service: 
  • Did they measure outcomes that could be part of an overall indicator of performance to demonstrate value? Tick - they use EQ5D5L, something I hadn’t known about but understand other community services uses also.  Excellent.
  • Do they promote self-care? Tick - they are running a self-care course and are also developing modules to be run through the Trust's Living Well Academy
  • Technology? Tick – they use Healthtalkonline and Speech and Language Therapists use apps to help people following a stroke.
  • What about the psychological aspects of the community care pathway for stroke? Tick - The team has worked with the Bury psychological therapies team to develop the psychological offer in the overall care pathway. They are now trained in Brief Solution Focused Therapy and Motivational Interviewing and speak positively about whole person care. 

As I said I was inspired and it was a perfect example of how Trusts like Pennine Care are well placed to provide whole person care to our patients. 

I can’t do justice to how impressive this team really is. It’s early days and they are still building the data to measure overall performance, but all the core ingredients are there to deliver a world class service. The team should be rightly proud of themselves and commissioners congratulated for attending to the out of hospital care needs on the stroke pathway.

District nursing visit 

A few days later and I was back in Bury.  I know there are great quality bargains to be grabbed on the market but I didn’t have time to stop unfortunately, as I was visiting one of the district nursing teams for work. Although I’m not sure having the privilege to spend time with dedicated, skilled, professional nurses can really be described as work. 


I spent the morning with Sian, Vicky, Karen and Jo talking about the challenges faced in district nursing services.  I was fortunate to shadow Karen carrying out her clinical duties and talking to her reminded me how complex and demanding the district nursing role is.

In my last blog, I talked about polarities and managing change and within Pennine Care we have recently carried out a district nursing review, involving nurses from all of our boroughs. 

We and system leaders up and down England mustn’t forget that district nurses are busy, skilled professionals who carry out complex, difficult and demanding work. 

As hospitals try to move care outside of hospital and GPs look for support to high levels of demands, where does the care go?  Into community services and often to the district nurse. They can rarely say no to demands, go about their hard work effectively (but often quietly) and make a huge difference to the lives of people who need their care.

The community models of care, especially district nursing, need dedicated thought leadership, investment of time and resources to develop models and an understanding that a district nursing team has the same floors and ceilings of capacity as a ward does. 

We talk about hard truths for ward staffing levelswhich I fully agree with, but it isn’t just wards that have to be safely and effectively staffed, so does the community.

It was a real pleasure to spend time with such a hard working team, not short on ideas on what they feel needs to be done. But I think the NHS system needs to listen more to their voice and not overlook the community filling in the sandwich between primary care and hospitals.